Thursday, December 6, 2007

Letter to Ron Paul

I wrote this letter to Ron Paul (http://www.ronpaul2008.com/). What I would like is some:

1) Feedback as to the validity and logic of my arguments
2) Any grammatical and/or spelling issues
3) Your overall opinion

I am going to send this letter before too long, I just want to let everyone proof read it (mainly my mom :) ) so that I don't sound like a moron.

Thanks.

PS Yes I am still very influenced in my thinking by Ayn Rand.

Dr. Paul,

I am a Christian and grew up in a church pastored by my father. I always looked up to him as an intelligent man of faith. During the years George H.W. Bush was President I remember many people in the congregation having difficulties making ends meet as the tax cuts for the upper class did not trickle down to the lower classes. I remember vividly the election of 1992 and waiting up with my dad as the results were tallied. I was 9 years old in 1992 and had no idea what was happening only that a “good guy” was winning and the “bad guy” was losing. I was overjoyed when, in my mind, the GI Joes beat Cobra.

In 1996 the same thing occurred, the only difference being that I was 13 and understood the process by which Presidents were elected and some of the politics that went alongside the election, making one person “better” than the other. The only issue in my mind, however, was to choose the same guy my dad did because I could never defeat him in an argument and he always picked the “right” guy.

A funny thing happened between 1996 and 2000. Not only did I stop believing that my dad was always right, but I began to date a girl whose father was the most conservative Republican I had ever met. These two people profoundly influenced my thoughts and decisions right through the election in 2000. I became a Republican the first time I had a serious talk with my girlfriend’s dad about politics. For him, the only issues were faith based. George Bush was a Christian, a Baptist no less, and Al Gore was, in his words “The Antichrist.”

Needless to say, I was not going to side with the Antichrist so I staunchly defended Bush in front of my parents and siblings even though my parents were the only ones in the house old enough to vote. I was 17 in 2000 and had finally become a Republican.

I consider myself an intelligent individual and as such I decided that Gore was not the Antichrist, since the Antichrist would have won the election, attempted to brand all of us with the Mark of the Beast, and martyred me as a supporter of the God and the Republicans. I was not, however, willing to admit defeat to my four younger sisters and my two highly educated parents let alone start that argument with my fire and brimstone "in-laws".

Thankfully, while I was dealing with these issues, my girlfriend and I parted ways and I was free to think about considering myself a Democrat without immediately being thrown into the fiery pits of Hades.

Another relationship soon started and this girl was also a Republican and a Christian, as were her parents, but they were Reagan Republicans believing that the Republicans had saved the country during the years of 1980-1992 and that Clinton had merely reaped the benefits of Reagan’s amazing ideas. Laissez-faire economics, the trickledown theory, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and many other nuggets of Republican theory and propoganda were pumped into my brain.

Fortunately, having dealt with crazy Republicans in the past, I knew better than to adapt their ideas for my own and decided to do my own research. What I found was a morass of political speak with little to no actual politics. What I realized was that most people were affiliated with one party or another based on one or two personal experiences.

This realization led me to seek out the foundation of both the Republican and the Democratic Party and why they believe what they believe. What I realized was that the difference goes all the way back to, and was the cause of, the Civil War. The South believed in the right of states to govern themselves, to make decisions that were best for their state. The North believed that a strong and central national government was the only way for a true nation to function. I apologize for this brief history lesson, but most people think that the war was about slavery, which it never was, and the struggles of the Blacks after the Civil War show just how little it had to do with civil liberties.

Currently, Republicans are the south and the Democrats are the north, at least theoretically. While I cannot comment on the politics of the first Bush, Reagan, or Clinton since I had no vested interest in their presidencies; I can, however, comment on Bush the second.

He is not a Republican. No true Republican would ever usurp the power of Congress in order to declare a war on a foreign nation. No true Republican would ever increase the power of the national government to a point where state, let alone individual, rights and privileges are not taken into consideration in foreign, fiscal, or educational policy. I am a Republican because I believe that the more levels of abstraction you have between an individual and the person making decisions on their behalf, the less those decisions take into consideration the feelings of the people and the more muddied the waters become with lobbyists. I also strongly support laissez-faire almost everything. Centralized power is an anathema to every true Republican. George W. Bush is not a Republican.

I am writing this letter because you are the first person that I have ever seen who kind of says what the Republican Party believes and this makes me proud. You do not, however, follow a true laissez-faire Republican government, which is the other reason for this letter.

I do not agree with your treatment of immigrants since a true laissez-faire Republican economy would allow any immigrant to enter the country and make a living and live out the American Dream, much like all of our ancestors did at one time or another. Social services for immigrants should be available to all. The poor of the world are just as poor, if not more so, than the poor of the United States and we should not discriminate based on their parentage.

I also vehemently disagree with your treatment of Social Security. I believe that the demise of the family and the poor quality of life for senior citizens is because of Social Security not because the system is broken. Senior citizens deserve to be taken care of and should be taken care of by first themselves, then their families, and finally the government. The demise of the family structure in America today is because we take our elderly, warehouse them, and wait for them to die. The policy that I believe is the most just is to discontinue Social Security all together and to envelop the poor elderly into the exact same bracket as the poor single mother. After all, the only difference is age. Too many Americans think that Social Security is their retirement; the phasing out of Social Security in favor of a private retirement plan should be the priority of any true Republican.

I also believe that the public school funding needs to be phased out in favor of vouchers for every student. Bad public schools would not have any students because no students would choose to attend the school. Privatization of every school would increase the quality of life for every student since schools would be competing for the vouchers of students in the area. Non-state funded colleges and universities continue to be the best institutions of higher learning in the world. Remove funding for state schools so that their mediocrity would not be allowed to continue freeing up that money for scholarships to the most promising students to any university. That way promising poor students could attend Harvard for the same price as their nearest state school. The state schools would then be forced to increase the quality of education or decrease prices in order to offer an alternative.

Competition breeds excellence. That is why America is the strongest nation in the world. Unless Republicans continue to foster an environment of competition like they are supposed to do, America will continue to fall further and further behind other nations in terms of quality.
It is my belief, as a Christian, that everyone is worthwhile and everyone has immeasurable abilities. What we need to do as a nation is to foster those abilities. The people in the US who are lazy, in a just system, would reap the rewards of laziness and the people who work, no matter how intelligent they are, will reap the rewards of work.

There is another person, who is my hero, who said those exact words about reaping and sowing and also about laziness and work: Jesus Christ. It is time that Republicans began acting like Republicans and stop name dropping Christianity since Republicans and Christians are doing a disservice to each other by allowing lazy politics to take the place of actual thought.

Sincerely,
Nathaniel Noonen

2 comments:

Unknown said...

First of all, your intelligence makes me laugh, as well as become slightly ashamed of my own half-assing in school (which I have worked on and believe I am improving on...just in time for seminary). Second of all, I like what you have to say. It's pure Nate Noonen. Third of all, I miss having you around here so that I can hear that kind of stuff more often. I miss you dude, and I hope that life is treating you well.

Anonymous said...

Man, I've come a long way in my understanding of history. I'm not deleting these older posts because they're a good snapshot of what happens when you take someone who legitimately cares about justice and boil them in whiteness.